🏈 NFL All Day

NFL All Day is a digital collectible marketplace that lets football fans collect video highlights in the form of NFTs and connect with other like-minded fans from around the world. On NFL All Day, football fans can collect non-fungible tokens (NFTs) called "Moments" that capture highlights of great passes, touchdowns and other plays.

What is a Moment?

A Moment is a digital video clip of an iconic play from a National Football League game that has been stored on the blockchain. Moments are immutable, meaning they can’t be edited or deleted and can be stored forever on a blockchain.

Website, Marketplace, Packs, Instagram, Twitter, Discord

❓ What are NFL All Day Moments and packs?

NFL All Day packs are bundled Moments bought in the NFL All Day marketplace. Each Moment belongs to a specific tier, which indicates the number of highlights available and the rarity of the Moment. Here are the four different tiers of NFL All Day Moments:

Common (About 92% of all Moments): The basic primer of any NFL All Day Moments collection with mint counts between 4,000 and 10,000.
Rare (About 8% of all Moments): Mid-tier moments with mint counts of 499 to 1,200.
Legendary (About 0.17% of all Moments): Very rare and highly desired Moments. Only about 200 Legendary Moments exist with mint counts of fewer than 99.
Ultimate (About 0.01% of all Moments): This tier comprises the rarest Moments with a mint count of one to 10

✍️ Description of work:

To provide a comprehensive overview of the NFL ALL DAY Tournament Round 2 NFTs, the following graphs and details have been visualized.

You can check:

Total number of NFL ALL DAY Tournament Round 2 NFTs single chart
Number of unique NFTs (Play type)
The most valuable NFTs (Play type)
Number of unique play types
Number of unique players
Average NFTs price

for an in-depth analysis of the NFL ALL DAY Tournament Round 2 NFTs.

The charts of the top 50 players are the next point that is important for our analysis.
- You can see them in three different charts, as follows:
  - Based on the Maximum price of NFT for each player
  - Based on the “Number of players NFTs“
  - Based on “Average NFTs price for each player“
Top 50 players with their number of paly type

✅Findings and Observations:

Based on the diagrams above:

Total NFL ALL DAY Tournament Round 2 NFTs is more than 1,208M.

\
Reception ==(41.1%==), Rush (==18.5%==), and Pass (==11.7%==) account for more than ==70%== of play type NFTs with ==180119==, ==81271==, and ==51333== NFTs, respectively.
Reception (==36.5%==), Rush (==20.4%==) and Pass (==16.2%==) account for more than ==70%== of the most valuable NFTs with ==7.98712M==, ==4.472023M== and ==3.549675M== FLOW respectively.

\
The total number of unique play types is ==21==, and the total number of unique players is ==423==.
"Pressure" has the highest average NFT price of ==2920.5== FLOW in the chart of average NFT prices.
- The second is "Player Melt" with ==134.1985== FLOW per NFT.
\
Cooper Kupp has the highest number of NFTs with ==5055== NFTs.
- Second is Nick Chubb (==3783== NFT), and third is Stefon Diggs (==3675== NFT).
Odell Beckham Jr. had the most valuable NFT based on "Top 50 Players (Maximum Price of NFTs)" whose price is ==50K== FLOW.
- Aaron Rodgers is the second rank. ==45K== FLOW is the value of its NFT.
- The third most expensive NFT is that of Patrick Mahomes II at ==31.5K== FLOW.
\
The most expensive NFTs in "Top 50 Players (Average NFTs Price)" is related to the Terry Lance of ==5770,273== FLOW.
- Rashod Bateman (==2415.7== FLOW) and Nick Bolton (==1292.125== FLOW) take second and third place respectively.
4 players have records in 3 play types. 24 players have records in 2 play types.

By merging the top 50 player tables ("Top 50 Players (Maximum Price of NFTs)", "Top 50 Players (Average NFTs Price)", and "Top 50 Players (Number of player NFTs )" ), this fact figured out that there is only 4 player which has a record in these tables.

Ja’Marr Chase, Josh Allein, Patrick Mahomes II and Russell Wilson.

❓ Try to normalize/control for player and play type to determine which is more important. For example, take some metrics of a high-value player's moment sales regardless of play type. Then, similarly, look at play types regardless of players for this analysis.

The front charts show the following:

Seal volume of the top 5 play type of the top 50 players (in percent).

Based on this chart, "Pass" was performed by more than 75% of the top 50 players.

"Reception", ”Rush" and "Player Melt" were performed by the top 50 players with more than 59%, 56% and 54%, respectively.

The “Interaction“ sales volume performed by the top 50 players is ZERO!

It shows that the “interaction” play type is regardless of to top 50 players!

NFT seal’s volume of the top 50 players (In percentage) shows that the top 50 players account for more than 56.7% of the total sales volume.

Tha above facts shows that “Players“ are more important than “Play types“

✍️ Introduction:

Is there a type of play that is more valuable, or do valuable players sell at higher prices regardless of play type?

Try to normalize/control for player and play type to determine which is more important. For example, take some metrics of a high-value player's moment sales regardless of play type. Then, similarly, look at play types regardless of players for this analysis.

Lastly, see if there was any meaningful purchasing behavior for certain players who outperformed in Week 1. For example, did Saquon Barkley's sales increase after he ran for 160 yards and scored a touchdown.

❓Lastly, see if there was any meaningful purchasing behavior for certain players who outperformed in Week 1. For example, did Saquon Barkley's sales increase after he ran for 160 yards and scored a touchdown?

First of all we calculate the following Data:

Min price
Max price
The average price

each player per week.

(Max price - Min Price) defined as “Max variation of sales value for each player per week. “ After that, we normalize the Max variation by dividing it by the “Average price of each player per week. “

By “Normalized Variation” we can have a good judgment about that meaningful purchasing.

In week 1, the following players have a high normalized variation.

T.Y. Hilton

Andy Dalton

Evan McPherson

Dak Prescott

Austin Dulin

George Kittle

K’Waun Wiliams

DeVonta Smith

Tee Higgins.

you can see, we can not find Saquon Barkley on this list despite the act as an outstanding running.

It means there is no meaningful purchasing behavior for certain players who outperformed in Week 1.

References:

✔️ Result and discussion:

Based on our findings and above explanations:

“Players“ are more important than “Play types“

There is no meaningful purchasing behavior for certain players who outperformed in Week 1.

flipside