Create a dashboard that allows you to compare multiple validators based on their voting history. End result should allow a user to select multiple validators and see how they each voted on specific proposals in the past.

The history of Validators in the Osmosis governance has been investigated in this analysis. Also, the second part represents a comparison tool to compare the selected Validators from various aspects. This dashboard is divided into the following parts:

• General behavior of Validators
• Comparison of the selected Validators
• Conclusion

Validators on the Osmosis blockchain are responsible for maintaining the security and integrity of the network by validating transactions and adding them to the blockchain. They perform this task by running a full node on the network and participating in consensus with other validators.

To become a validator on Osmosis, one must first stake a certain amount of OSM tokens as collateral. This collateral serves as an incentive for validators to act honestly and not engage in any malicious behavior that could harm the network.

Validators are also responsible for voting on governance proposals and making decisions that affect the future direction of the network. As such, they play a critical role in shaping the Osmosis ecosystem and ensuring its long-term success.

Overall, validators are an essential part of the Osmosis blockchain and help to ensure that it remains secure, decentralized, and resilient against attacks.

The data provided by Flipside has been used to handle this analysis. To handle this investigation the following steps have been passed as below:

• The voting performance on networks
  • Table→ osmosis.core.fact_governance_validator_votes
  • Metrics→ vote count, participated proposals, Available proposals and participation rate of each Validator, Vote change ratio and most popular change paths for Validators
• Validator comparison
  • First select the Validators to comparison
  • Metrics for comparison→ Voting performance over time, the participated proposals for both of the Validators, Average voting power of each Validator, Vote change rate of selected Validators, and changing path.
• Conclusion: By aggregating the outcomes of the steps, draw a conclusion about the voting performance and history of Validators in the Osmosis governance.