This dashboard analyzes key on-chain activity on the Ethereum network over the past 90 days, focusing specifically on high-quality user behavior. Metrics are filtered using Flipside’s Quality Score (≥ 4), offering insights into the organic health, fee contribution, and transaction integrity of the network.
Methodology
Data Source:
datascience_public.ethereum.chain_stats
Date Range:
CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL '90 days'
Filtering: High-quality users =
Flipside Score ≥ 4
Metrics Tracked:
Users: Active, Quality Active
Transactions: Count, Quality Count
Fees: ETH & USD (Total & Quality)
Transfers: Volume (USD, Total vs. Quality)
TVL
Correlation between all major metrics
1. Daily Active vs. Quality Active Users
Description: Visualizes daily total active users alongside the subset passing quality thresholds.
Insight: Helps assess the share and stability of high-quality participation in Ethereum's on-chain activity.
2. Daily Quality User Percentage
Description: Shows the percentage of active users that meet quality criteria each day.
Insight: Measures behavioral integrity among users; significant dips may imply bot surges or short-term inorganic activity.
3. Daily Transactions vs. Quality Transactions
Description: Compares overall transaction volume to transactions from high-quality users.
Insight: Allows us to monitor how much daily activity is driven by organic, quality users.
4. Daily Quality Transaction Percentage
Description: Percentage of all transactions considered high-quality.
Insight: Useful for identifying shifts in organic engagement patterns. Sharp drops may indicate inorganic or speculative spikes.
5. Daily Total vs. Quality Fees (USD)
Description: Total transaction fees vs. those contributed by quality users (in USD).
Insight: Shows financial participation integrity—i.e., are valuable network contributors also high quality?
6. Daily Quality Fee Percentage
Description: Percentage of total fees paid by high-quality users.
Insight: Declines may signal gamified/spammy fee-driven activity from low-quality actors.
7. Daily Correlation: Quality User % vs. Quality Fee %
Description: Correlation between the share of quality users and the share of fees they contribute.
Insight:
Coefficient: -0.007
Interpretation: Very weak negative correlation. This suggests that increases in quality user count don’t strongly predict increases in their fee share.
8. Quality Users’ Fee Sensitivity Over Time
Description: Compares average fee per quality transaction (in ETH) vs. total daily fees.
Insight: Evaluates if high-quality users adjust behavior when network fees rise.
High correlation (0.8): Indicates high-quality users are sensitive to network conditions and potentially adjust engagement accordingly.
9. Daily Total vs. Quality Transfer Volume (USD)
Description: Compares total token transfer volume to that initiated by high-quality users (in USD).
Insight: Gauges the role of quality users in capital movement on Ethereum.
10. Daily Quality Transfer Volume Ratio
Description: Shows the share of transfer volume attributable to quality users.
Insight:
Average Ratio: 0.08
Indicates that only ~8% of daily transfer volume comes from high-quality actors—potentially revealing heavy speculative/inorganic capital flow.
11. Correlation Between TVL and Key Quality Metrics
Description: Displays Pearson correlations between TVL (USD) and:
Quality Transactions:
~0.47
Quality Fees (USD):
~0.53
Active Quality Users:
~0.61
Interpretation:
Moderate Positive Correlation in all metrics suggests:
When more value is locked in the network, there tends to be more high-quality activity.
Especially stronger for active quality users, implying TVL may attract more organic participation.