In this analysis I performed Layer3 Cubes Interactions on 6 chains (Arbitrium, Base, BSC, Blast, Optimism, Polygon);

1. Base network stands out with over 4.75 million cubes minted, more than double the amount of the second-highest chain, Arbitrum. Both Arbitrum and Polygon also show significant activity, each exceeding one million cubes minted. Optimism and Blast demonstrate moderate 1) levels of interaction, with just under and over half a million cubes minted, respectively. BSC has the least activity, with fewer than 400,000 cubes minted. These results suggest that the Base network is the most active and might be the preferred choice for users or applications requiring high minting activities, while BSC’s lower numbers could imply either less adoption for this specific interaction or greater efficiency leading to fewer minting events.

2. The analysis of Layer3 Cubes interactions shows that all six blockchain networks maintain high success rates for transactions. Base leads with a 99.80% success rate, followed closely by Blast (99.79%), BSC (99.76%), Polygon (99.76%), and Arbitrum (99.28%). Optimism has the lowest success rate at 98.79%. Failure rates are minimal across all networks, with Base having the lowest at 0.20% and Optimism the highest at 1.21%