==Introduction==

Osmosis is a network, developed through the Cosmos SDK (software development kit), using the infrastructure provided by this giant, which seeks to be a bridge between the different blockchains of this ecosystem. At the same time, Osmosis is an AMM, or in simpler words, a decentralized exchange, in which we can exchange coins from the networks to which it connects.

This project was born with the idea of being an AMM within Cosmos, but ended up using the SDK provided by this network ecosystem. Ultimately, Osmosis ended up assembling its own blockchain on top of this structure. Being a blockchain within Cosmos, we know that its consensus is Proof of Stake. Consequently, those who validate the transactions and create the blocks of the network are precisely the validators. Then we find the average users, who can delegate or stake their tokens with the validators in exchange for a juicy reward. Although Osmosis uses the Tendermint consensus, like Terra, Secret or Cosmos, it has applied differential criteria.

==Methods==

In this analysis we will focus on SuperFluid validating activity. More specifically, we will analyze the following data:

• SuperFluis activity by validators

• SuperFluid activity on selected pool

  • Deposits by validator
  • Net deposits by validator
  • Volume deposited by validator
  • Average deposited by validator
  • SuperFluix TVL by validator

• General activity on these pools

• Liquidity and number of actions over time

• Aggregated volume over time

• Average deposited volume over time

• Distributions of transactions, users and volume by actions

Daily

Weekly

Monthly

Daily

Weekly

Month

Chosen pool activity (1 is the default one)

In this section we have analysed the Pool activity on a daily, weekly and monthly basis. The metrics analysed were as follows:

• Number of actions over time
• Liquidity actions over time
• Distribution of volume by action
• Average deposited volume over time
• Aggregated volume over time
• Distribution of transactions by action
• Distribution of users by action

SuperFluid activity on pools

In this section we have analysed the Dive deep in superfluid activity in pools on a daily, weekly and monthly basis. The metrics analysed were as follows:

• Number of actions over time
• Liquidity actions over time
• Average deposited volume over time
• Aggregated volume over time

SuperFluid activity by validators

In the first graph we can see the deposits by validator. We can clearly see that from April until today there has been a downward trend. There is one validator that stands out above the others. In the second graph we have analysed the net deposits by validator. Here we can clearly see that there is a validator that increased until it reached 20k but then decreased progressively. We can see that at the beginning there was a fairly stable trend but the net deposits have been decreasing.

We then analysed the volume deposited by validator. We can see that in April the volume increased to almost 100M. Afterwards, these figures went down but the volume deposited by validators has remained fairly stable. Some with higher figures than others. Finally, if we look at the last graph of Superfluid TVL by validator we see that there is one validator that stands out above the others. Since February it has been progressively increasing its TVL. On the other hand, the other validators have been increasing since April but more slowly.

SuperFluid activity on selected pool

General activity on these pools

In these graphs we can see different aspects such as: deposits by validator, net deposits by validator, volume deposited by validator, average deposited by validator and the SuperFluid TVL by validator.

These graphs will vary depending on the pool the user chooses at the top of the dashboard.