cypherOsmosis decentralization
Updated 2022-11-06
99
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
›
⌄
--Props 114, 196 & 337 were all passed in an effort to promote decentralization within the ecosystem.
--After these proposals, how was governance impacted by this effort?
--Analyze the participation of the new validators on the governance proposals after the active set increases.
--Did new validators vote more or less than the original top 66% of validators?
--Did time play a factor? Analyze changes in governance participation t+30,+60,+90 days after these proposals.
-- Payout 105.042 OSMO
-- ACTIONS:
-- determine new and old validatars: 100 old vs 50 new since props 114
-- Analyse voting participation for new and old validators: did new validators vote more or less than the orignial top 66% of validators
--
-- select
-- min(block_timestamp) as first_time,
-- validator_address
-- from osmosis.core.fact_staking
-- group by validator_address
-- order by first_time asc
WITH DELEGATED_AMOUNT AS (
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('DAY', BLOCK_TIMESTAMP) AS DAY,
VALIDATOR_ADDRESS,
SUM(AMOUNT/POW(10,DECIMAL)) AS DELEGATED_AMOUNT
FROM osmosis.core.fact_staking
WHERE ACTION='delegate'
AND TX_STATUS='SUCCEEDED'
GROUP BY DAY, VALIDATOR_ADDRESS
),
REDELEGATED_AMOUNT AS (
SELECT DATE_TRUNC('DAY', BLOCK_TIMESTAMP) AS DAY,
REDELEGATE_SOURCE_VALIDATOR_ADDRESS,
SUM(AMOUNT/POW(10,DECIMAL)) AS REDELEGATED_AMOUNT
FROM osmosis.core.fact_staking
Run a query to Download Data