Decentralization Progress: Flow vs Osmosis
Flow blockchain and Osmosis blockchain are two distinct blockchain networks with different features and purposes.
Flow blockchain is a blockchain network designed for building decentralized applications and games with high throughput and low latency. It is specifically built for NFTs (Non-Fungible Tokens) and has been used by popular NFT marketplaces like NBA Top Shot. Flow is also designed to be developer-friendly and enables developers to build decentralized applications using a variety of programming languages.
Osmosis blockchain, on the other hand, is a Cosmos-based blockchain network that focuses on creating a decentralized exchange (DEX) for liquidity providers to earn yield on their holdings. Osmosis is built on the Tendermint consensus algorithm and enables users to trade assets from different blockchain networks using an innovative liquidity pool model. Osmosis also has a native governance token called OSMO that can be used to vote on proposals for network upgrades and changes.
Both Flow and Osmosis use blockchain technology to create decentralized networks that enable trustless transactions and eliminate the need for intermediaries. However, they have different use cases and target different audiences. Flow is designed for building NFT marketplaces and games, while Osmosis is focused on creating a decentralized exchange for liquidity providers.
Decentralization is a key feature of both Flow blockchain and Osmosis blockchain.
On the Flow blockchain, decentralization is achieved through a consensus algorithm called PoS (Proof of Stake), which enables users to validate transactions and earn rewards for doing so. The network is secured by a group of validators who are responsible for validating transactions and maintaining the integrity of the blockchain. Validators are elected by the community and can be replaced if they fail to meet the network's standards.
In addition to the PoS consensus algorithm, Flow also features a multi-node architecture that enables developers to create their own nodes and participate in the validation process. This decentralizes the network further and ensures that no single entity controls the network.
On the Osmosis blockchain, decentralization is achieved through a similar PoS consensus algorithm, which is used to validate transactions and secure the network. The network is maintained by a group of validators who are responsible for proposing and voting on governance proposals and maintaining the network's infrastructure.
In addition to the PoS consensus algorithm, Osmosis also features a decentralized exchange (DEX) that enables users to trade assets from different blockchain networks without relying on a centralized intermediary. The DEX is powered by a liquidity pool model, which enables users to earn yield on their holdings by providing liquidity to the network.
Overall, both Flow and Osmosis are decentralized blockchain networks that enable users to participate in the validation process and govern the network through a PoS consensus algorithm. They both prioritize decentralization as a key feature to enable trustless transactions and eliminate the need for intermediaries.


This dashboard compares various decentralization metrics for Flow and Osmosis blockchains.
flow.core.ez_staking_actions
: This is an API endpoint for the Flow blockchain that provides information about staking actions, such as delegations and undelegations. By using this API endpoint, we can track the activity of individual validators and the total stake volume on the network.
osmosis.core.fact_staking
: This is an API endpoint for the Osmosis blockchain that provides information about the staking activity on the network. By using this API endpoint, we can track the activity of individual validators and the total stake volume on the network.
Using these API endpoints, we can obtain various average metrics for each blockchain, such as the average stake volume per validator, the average number of transactions per user, and the average number of users per validator. By comparing these metrics across the two blockchains, we can gain insights into their respective levels of decentralization.
For example, if the average stake volume per validator is higher on Osmosis than on Flow, it could indicate that Osmosis is more centralized, as a smaller number of validators are controlling a larger portion of the network's stake. Similarly, if the average number of transactions per user is higher on Flow than on Osmosis, it could indicate that Flow has a more active and diverse user base.